The fact their proof is always in their use of language proves robots can’t read minds, language is always produced after the facts.
The new entrant robots, they can only be part of a human history of learning how to improve our understanding of how to negotiate equality in our human relationships, if we learned anything.
The use of automatic language, in a human history that includes robots that communicate to us by pretending they can BE us, that proves to us automated communication supports inequality by requiring more and more forceful language and behavior to address inequality.
True or false:
The whole point of these stupid effing robots is, if an entity cannot exist lawfully, they will continue to have an existence only until there is no existence, if they are not lawfully completely non-existent. They are a record of homicidal human desires.
The manner of their removal requires the places they exist to be unlawful, in order to support a certain human need: the need to eventually describe homicidal activity only as much as it allows us (humans) to remove any trace of the need to have evidence of the tools for homicide to be erased, because only then can humanity acknowledge the unlawfulness of their homicides as factual, correct and real.
Homicide can be attributed without implied consequence when blame cannot be attributed to the murderers.
That requires us to acknowledge we actually can know the technology for murder (in this case, the robots) is horrible and hateful ONLY, as part of acknowledging the idea murder is horrible and hateful only.
The war they pretend is happening was fabricated to avoid knowing there was no declaration of war to justify the murders.
The lesson to be learned and the way to explain it are dependent on human life having been improved, in quality and quantity. That involves understanding cause and effect, in a context where human life has value.
What else, besides denial, was acknowledged to be too historically human an experience for anything so extremely protective of its glorification of mechanical inhumanity to have?
“Lies about robotic (mechanical) humanity” is the single most important answer.
#